Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- englisch:working-with-texts [21.11.2021 (12:48)] – [Reference in your own text] retemirabile
+++ englisch:working-with-texts [01.09.2025 (10:04)] (aktuell) – Externe Bearbeitung 127.0.0.1
@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
 ====== Working with texts ======
-===== Always write about a text, a movie, a play … in the present tense  =====
+===== Always write about a text, a movie, a play … in the present  =====
 |<100% 50% >|
@@ Zeile 29: / Zeile 29: @@
 |<100% 33% 33% >|
 ^✅ Correct^⭕️ OK, but not ideal^ ❌ Wrong^
-|The author writes that many US citizens are in a “mood of fatigue and apathy” **<wrap hi>(l. 7)</wrap>**\\ \\ ▶ Best option because the **line reference is clear** and still as **unobtrusive [unaufdringlich]** as possible. The **literal quote** [wörtliches Zitat] at the end is marked by **quotation marks**  [Anführungszeichen]|The author writes //<wrap hi>in line 7</wrap>// that many US citizens are in a “mood of fatigue and apathy”. \\ \\ ▶ Not ideal because the line reference has too much weight by making it part of the sentence structure, the literal quote does have quotation marks – so this option is not wrong but also not as good as the first one|The author writes that many US citizens are in a mood of fatigue and apathy\\ \\ ▶ Wrong because \\ (a) there is **no line reference** at all and \\ (b) the last couple of words are a **literal quote** that is **not marked by quotation marks**|
+|//The author writes that many US citizens are in a “mood of fatigue and apathy” <wrap hi>(l. 7)</wrap>.//\\ \\ ▶ Best option because the **line reference is clear** and still as **unobtrusive [unaufdringlich]** as possible. The **literal quote** [wörtliches Zitat] at the end is marked by **quotation marks**  [Anführungszeichen]|//The author writes <wrap hi>in line 7</wrap> that many US citizens are in a “mood of fatigue and apathy”.// \\ \\ ▶ Not ideal because the line reference has too much weight by making it part of the sentence structure, the literal quote does have quotation marks – so this option is not wrong but also not as good as the first one|//The author writes that many US citizens are in a mood of fatigue and apathy.//\\ \\ ▶ Wrong because \\ (a) there is **no line reference** at all and \\ (b) the last couple of words are a **literal quote** that is **not marked by quotation marks**|
+==== How to write line references ====
+There are some abbreviations [Abkürzungen] for writing line references that you should know:
+|<100% 10em 16em >|
+^What you write^What it means^Further explanation^
+^l. 7|line 7|refers to [bezieht sich auf] just that one line|
+^l. 7 f|line 7 and exactly **one following line**| refers to lines 7 and 8|
+^l. 7 ff|line 7 and the following line**s**|refers to lines 7 and //some// lines after it|
+^ll. 7 – 10|lines 7 to 10|refers to exactly those four lines, the double “l” is for the plural “lines”, it’s usually not used with the “ff” abbreviation|